Personal statements are not fun or easy to write. It is not easy to represent yourself on paper. I mean, what are colleges looking for? Might it be my charm? My devotion to the Spatula God? My bizarre phobia about e-mail? What elements should I tell them to make them want me in their program? It feels like an academic popularity contest or something. How should I wear my hair so that the most universities will vote for me?
Sure, I write about myself all the time on this blog. But it’s not the final word about me. And you may not have noticed this, but I occasionally obscure my true feelings about issues through exaggeration, blurring the line between sarcasm and sincerity, talking about events not emotions, etc. That’s because I am like a lovely, erratic butterfly: try to pin me down and you just STAB me through the heart and kill me, to be left on display like some sad, stiff relic. Okay, so I’m being dramatic, but I honestly don’t believe anyone has such a static personality that it can be summed up in 500 words or whatever. (Oops! Did I just undermine my entire choice of lifelong pursuit by suggesting that words can’t capture a real person? Well, no, there’s definitely wiggle room. a) My characters, however round, and however complex their story arcs might be, are not attempted representations of “real” people I’ve met, out in the world. b) You know how some people can draw figures and faces that look real but can’t make them look like the particular persons they’re trying to represent? It could be like that. c) I never said I don’t believe a person can’t be summed up in a novel, and I want to write novels much more than I ever wanted to write short stories. d) Weren’t you listening? I was just telling you that I am erratic and not static. I can change my mind about representing people in prose whenever I want and still be consistent with my statement that I can’t be adequately described in a personal statement, let alone a blog entry! Read up on logical traps, Grasshopper. Bwahahahaha! And before you point out the “But something has to be the objective truth so you have to be wrong at some point in that cycle” bit, please reflect that I am pretty sure I am inventing my world through observation of and beliefs regarding it.)
Anyway, the point is: writing something about myself is limiting of myself. If I say I am untidy, aren’t I doing injustice to the times I feel like I love organizing and cleaning things? Okay, bad example. Haha, actually I do like to clean sometimes–it can be so satisfying. And organizing, well, it’s like a mix between a math problem and a creative project, sometimes–both of which, of course, I love to do. If I say I am an English person does that mean I can’t be a math person? If I say I love solitude, how can I represent the times I love to meet new people? If I counter everything I like with an opposite example in the essay like I’ve just been doing, how can I show those inflexible parts of me like vegetarianism and procrastination? Ugh. Ugh. Yeeaugh. Blauugh. Maybe if I don’t get into any MFA programs, I can at least convert some admissions officers to Spatulism.
By the way: to anyone wondering about comments (yes, Dad and Grampy, this means you), all you have to do to add a comment to, say, the most recent post, is to click on the link that says “_ Comments” (_ being “No” or a number) near the bottom right of said post. Or you can click on the title of the post, and then there will be a comments box at the bottom of the page. That’s it. So there’s no need to be shy…or (ahem, Dad) to comment repeatedly on the “Who is this?” page.